Attachment Theory

Source: John Bowlby, Attachment and Loss (1969/1973/1980); Mary Ainsworth, Patterns of Attachment (1978)

Finding

The infant’s bond with the primary caregiver is a primary biological system, not a byproduct of feeding. Ainsworth’s Strange Situation experiment identified three attachment styles: secure, anxious-resistant, and anxious-avoidant. Main later added disorganized (1986). Longitudinal studies show attachment style predicts relational patterns across the lifespan, though earned secure attachment is possible through later relationships or therapy.

Pattern Mapping

All five properties — Secure attachment is the five properties practiced by the caregiver before the child has language to name them. Alignment: the secure caregiver’s stated role and actual behavior are consistent. Honesty: the secure caregiver reflects the child’s actual emotional state. Humility: responds within the legitimate scope of caregiving without using the child to meet her own needs. Proportion: response matches the child’s distress — not under-responding (avoidant) or over-responding (anxious). Non-fabrication: does not deny the child’s experience or pretend everything is fine when it is not.

Connections

Status

Bowlby (1969/1973/1980) and Ainsworth (1978) are foundational. Stability of attachment patterns supported by meta-analysis (Fraley, 2002). The mapping to the five properties is this project’s structural interpretation.


The mapping to the five properties is this project’s structural interpretation, not an endorsement of any tradition.